Care England has failed in its legal attempt to challenge the fees paid by Essex County Council to care home providers in 2016/17.
In October 2016, Care England issued judicial review proceedings against Essex County Council challenging its decision setting the fee rates it would pay to independent care home providers during the year 2016/17. The decision affected around 60% of the 4,500 residential care placements made by the Council within Essex’s care home market.
The prices the council decided to pay were on average £163.57 per person per week below the cost of care in the case residential care, and £108.56 per person per week in the case of nursing care.
Professor Martin Green, chief executive of Care England said: “It is particularly disappointing that the judge hearing this case formed the view that the councillor who made the decision had carried out a sufficient enough enquiry into the sustainability of the Essex care home market when that enquiry was based not on the information that had been presented to him by council officers, but on his own knowledge and assumptions.
“Despite the court’s ruling, Care England remains particularly concerned that the Council’s decision jeopardises the sustainability of the care home market in Essex”.
“It is therefore deeply worrying that Essex Council is underfunding the care that it is required by law to provide and pay for. The council’s evidence that care homes can simply terminate the placements made by the Council if they believe the council is not paying enough, pays cavalier regard to the risks this poses to those individuals involved and the distress this would cause to them and their relatives. It seems however that the only option being presented to care homes in Essex is to exit the market.”
Care England says there seems to be a divide between the judiciary in their thinking and approaches to deciding cases where local authorities are challenged on how they decide the rates they will pay for residential social care for older people. The body says it will reflect on the court’s decision and how it may further support members and the much needed structure and clarity that is required in this area.